Design Case Studies    

Cross-Coupling Between Axes

The / thickness regulation, is a MIMO problem. So far you have treated each axis separately and closed one SISO loop at a time. This design is valid as long as the two axes are fairly decoupled. Unfortunately, this rolling mill process exhibits some degree of cross-coupling between axes. Physically, an increase in hydraulic force along the -axis compresses the material, which in turn boosts the repelling force on the -axis cylinders. The result is an increase in -thickness and an equivalent (relative) decrease in hydraulic force along the -axis.

The figure below shows the coupling.

Accordingly, the thickness gaps and rolling forces are related to the outputs of the - and -axis models by

Let's see how the previous "decoupled" LQG design fares when cross-coupling is taken into account. To build the two-axes model, shown in "Coupling Between the x- and y-axes" above, append the models Px and Py for the - and -axes.

For convenience, reorder the inputs and outputs so that the commands and thickness gaps appear first.

Finally, place the cross-coupling matrix in series with the outputs.

To simulate the closed-loop response, also form the closed-loop model by

You are now ready to simulate the open- and closed-loop responses to the driving white noises wx (for the -axis) and wy (for the -axis).

The response reveals a severe deterioration in regulation performance along the -axis (the peak thickness variation is about four times larger than in the simulation without cross-coupling). Hence, designing for one loop at a time is inadequate for this level of cross-coupling, and you must perform a joint-axis MIMO design to correctly handle coupling effects.


  LQG Design for the y-Axis MIMO LQG Design